KAMPALA, UGANDA –Â The High Court of Uganda has dismissed a negligence claim filed by former Deputy Head Teacher, Mr. Odetta Dennis, against St. Peter’s Senior Secondary School, Naalya Ltd.
The court ruled that Odetta’s actions were overly risky and beyond his expected duties when he fell into a septic tank in October 2017 while chasing a student who was hiding in the dormitory.
Related posts
“The law does not impose an obligation on employers to foresee or prevent every possible risk,” Justice Ssekaana Musa stated.
Odetta had argued that the poorly covered septic tank posed a safety hazard and that the school was negligent in maintaining a safe working environment, resulting in his injuries. He sought compensation for these injuries, along with other damages.
However, Justice Ssekaana noted that Odetta’s choice to pursue the student through an area with a septic tank went beyond the standard responsibilities of a Deputy Head Teacher.
“The actions of the plaintiff were overly risky and self-endangering,” Justice Ssekaana said.
Ex-Deputy Headteacher’s bid for compensation rejected in septic tank fall case against St. Peter’s Naalya secondary School
The judge emphasized that schools have a duty to ensure workplace safety but cannot safeguard employees against every conceivable risk.
“An employer’s duty of care requires reasonable precautions, but not a guarantee against all risks, especially when an employee takes unexpected actions,” Justice Ssekaana explained.
In Uganda, employers are expected to provide a safe working environment for employees, as outlined in the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 2006.
This law requires employers to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of all employees at work.
However, in this case, the court ruled that Odetta’s actions were not within the scope of his duties.
In a separate ruling, the court ordered the school to return a vehicle given to Odetta as a wedding gift in 2015 or provide compensation at market value.
Odetta had alleged that the school unlawfully demanded the car’s return upon his resignation in 2017.
“The vehicle was a gift, and once given, it cannot be taken back,” Justice Ssekaana said.
The court noted that video evidence showed the vehicle being presented to Odetta and his wife at their wedding reception, confirming the gift’s validity.
“The school’s demand for the car’s return after Odetta’s resignation was retaliatory, akin to a ‘jilted lover syndrome,’ and thus without legal merit,” Justice Ssekaana stated.
The court awarded Odetta 35% of the legal costs, recognizing his success on the vehicle claim.
This ruling highlights the balance between employer responsibility and employee caution in Uganda’s workplaces.
The Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development emphasizes the importance of occupational safety and health in the workplace.
Employers are expected to provide a safe and healthy work environment, and employees are expected to take reasonable care to ensure their own safety and health.
In Uganda, institutions such as the Department of Occupational Safety and Health, the Department of Labour, Employment and Industrial Relations, and the Uganda Human Rights Commission work to promote occupational safety and health.
